AdverseMe
Screening with the evidence attached.
I founded AdverseMe, a platform that brings together sanctions screening, politically exposed person (PEP) checks, adverse media research and ownership risk assessment for people and companies.
- Role
- Founder
- Product focus
- Risk screening, source evidence and reporting
A name match needs context.
Finding a result is the first step. A reviewer still needs to establish who it refers to, examine the source and decide what needs further investigation.
When that evidence is spread across search results, reports and notes, reconstructing the review becomes part of the work.
AdverseMe brings those checks and their supporting evidence into a single screening workflow, with a record that others can review.
From an initial check to a documented review.
Start with the person or company.
Run a screening with the available identity details. These help assess whether a result concerns the subject being checked or someone with a similar name.
Examine the findings.
Review the source evidence behind each result. AI-assisted assessment adds scores and reasoning in the app, supporting the reviewer's assessment of relevance and risk.
Keep the context in the report.
Download a PDF that brings together findings, source coverage, excluded matches and limitations. Another reviewer can see what was checked and where questions remain.
A workflow that fits the task.
Screen an individual name in the app, process a CSV batch or connect screening to an existing system through the REST API.
Human judgement stays central.
AI assessment supports the review. People weigh the evidence and decide what to investigate next, with source coverage and limitations visible throughout the process.